Search for: "State v. Million"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 22,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2015, 8:12 am
DiNardi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
In June 2019, Canadian authorities arrested nine people who reportedly smuggled over one million pounds of tobacco (valued at CA $110 million). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
Eckard v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Cardinale v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 9:28 am
Additional Resources: Grammer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:10 am
Jones v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:00 pm
In August, a 3-judge panel of the 6th Circuit held that plaintiffs have standing as state taxpayers to maintain an Establishment Clause challenge to the $100 million of state funds paid to KBHC to care for children. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:41 pm
The state of California has gained some added time to answer the request that it be required to reimburse the video game industry for more than $1.1 million for legal fees and expenses after the state lost its appeal to the Supreme Court n Brown v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Similarly, in State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
In Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
A trial date for Grant Street Group v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:08 am
The case is known as Centre Lane v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Prostitution law is back in the news, almost a year after the Supreme Court released its dramatic decision in Canada v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:39 am
” Spencer v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
I have been working my way through the mammoth (484 paragraphs plus chronology) judgment of Mr Justice Charles in J v J [2009] EWHC 2654 (Fam). [read post]
