Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 44,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
"* FOIL is applicable to “agency” records, but FOIL's definition of “agency” expressly excludes New York State's Judiciary and the New York State Legislature as agencies within the ambit of FOIL. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
"* FOIL is applicable to “agency” records, but FOIL's definition of “agency” expressly excludes New York State's Judiciary and the New York State Legislature as agencies within the ambit of FOIL. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
v=4qO3ZK5pEk0 [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:15 pm
In Javier v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 11:41 am
See State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
”) State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:41 pm
Gray” case, we learn that if an individual is a party to the conversation they can record the communication (Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:46 pm
Today’s news about the case being brought by a number of Irish record companies against Eircom (the former State-owned telco and still a very significant player in voice, broadband and other services) is unexpected in terms of its timing, I suppose, but also long ‘overdue’ in that it has been discussed and wondered about for some time. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 8:09 am
Briefs: record on appeal native outlet motion for leave to appeal appellant brief seneca nation amicus brief cayuga nation amicus brief state appellee brief state response to tribal amici reply brief [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:52 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:17 am
The post State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
In Innes v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:20 am
Case citation: UMG Recordings v. [read post]