Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 9,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:15 am
Facts: This case (Pettit v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
The Plausibility StandardIrrera v Humpherys, USCA, Second Circuit, Docket #16-2004 The Plausibility Standard was addressed the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:36 am
”1 Whether or not that may be accurate, a true history of the United States would be incomplete without a history of great political conversations, wherever they might have occurred. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
True, no states had in the interim attempted to rescind their ratifications, but that does not speak to the question whether contemporaneous consensus is needed. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:04 am
Merck & Co., was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
This will allow plaintiffs to argue that their claims somehow “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with sufficient force to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality announced in Kiobel. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:28 pm
In Texas State Technical College v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Papurello v State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, 144 F.Supp.3d 746 (W.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
Now, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
United States, 167 U. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:34 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:21 am
” But—as seen by this decision—the word “issue” is still quite frequently used.Regarding motions to dismiss, the Supreme Court of the United States nearly a decade ago famously wrote that that the “no set of facts” standard described in Conley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
United States argument 3/1/2010 Kiyemba v. [read post]
