Search for: "USA v. Little"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
They did cede new access to the United States—about 3.5% of the market—estimated to be worth USD $300 Million a year to the U.S. industry.[18] Will the United States and its politically powerful diary industry be satisfied with a CUSMA win that offers little in terms of increased access to the lucrative distributor and retail market? [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:28 am
Last summer the Second Circuit ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:54 am
Hinojos v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm
Trazo v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
(highlight added)Other than this reported media comment, CIPPIC has had very little visible role in this case. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Among many others, The Guardian, USA Today, The Hill, Reuters, and Talking Points Memo came calling. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
(highlight added)Other than this reported media comment, CIPPIC has had very little visible role in this case. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
From the opinion (USA, ex rel. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
A little over a year ago, in July 2017, President Trump tweeted a change in U.S. government policy to neither accept nor allow transgender individuals to serve “in any capacity” in the U.S. military. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
A 2007 study found “[v]ery little evidence of an ‘anticommons problem. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
And in cases where punitive damages are sought, consolidation of multiple plaintiffs into one trial is, in our view, a per se violation of Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
@Cairnmom3x: @taxgirl #wishlist invest in innovation, education and infrastructure, bring jobs back to small town USA from China. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm
Declined to explain his then status to SRA and is now apparently in the USA. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm
Its test case litigation efforts have all failed - most notably CCH v. [read post]
