Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
He noted that the decision relied on "spurious historical assumptions," contemporaneous common law from England and the United States, and disregarded settled U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
” The Lion Intoxilyzer 8000 Looks Familiar More evidence that the “source code” was developed by Lion Laboratories Limited in England. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
The Courts provided for in subsection A of this section [i.e., all the Oklahoma state courts –EV], when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, and the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto in making judicial decisions. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm
Federal and State LawsIn the United States, the United States Arbitration Act (Pub.L. 68–401, 43 Stat. 883, enacted February 12, 1925) (FAA) governs international arbitrations. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
The only question is whether asserting personal jurisdiction would be "consistent with the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:07 pm
Since joining the academy, Alfred has written regularly in the area of copyright law and served as counsel of record/lead author for an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 12 copyright scholars in the case of Campbell v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:20 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), under Alan Morrison's tutelage, I learned far more about the Appointments Clause than any reasonable lawyer would want to know. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:31 am
Special Report: Freedom of Speech Evolution of our Freedom of ExpressionCharles Davison Our history of freedom of speech is rooted in that of England and the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On 29 January 2024, the (children) Reporting Pilot expanded to a number of new courts across England and Wales, and a new Financial Remedy Reporting Pilot began. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
This is well accepted in Canadian law, and indeed in the law of most countries, including that of the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
This in itself puts the European system far ahead of the United States, in which diplomatic assurances are regarded as the province solely of the executive. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
