Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 32,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District Pennsylvania has affirmed a recommendation from a magistrate judge denying a motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
Florida, the United States Supreme Court found that Florida’s death-sentencing scheme, which required a judge rather than the jury to make the ultimate factual findings for imposition of a death sentence, unconstitutional holding that “[t]he Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:30 am
May 13, 2008) (Judge Ryan for a unanimous court), and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
The dissent is the longer portion of the decision in INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:15 am
Late last week, a federal jury came back with their verdict in the case of the United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Social housing and religion again: LF v United Kingdom" in Law & Religion UK, 17 June 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/06/17/social-housing-and-religion-again-lf-v-united-kingdom/ [read post]
