Search for: "United States v. Steele" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 8:58 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Steele III, What Other Courts Can Learn from Tax Court Exceptionalism, 2017 TXN 48-26. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
The same Google that forfeited $500 million to the United States government after it got caught assisting foreign pharmacies in importing illegal drugs thinks it’s OK to assist foreign rogue sites in the commission of online piracy. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
The Ocean Wind 1 and 2 project cancellations also followed the filing of County of Cape May v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am by neli
 On that front, this year’s biggest news is our new edition of the United States Constitution Annotated (CONAN), a comprehensive explanation of the United States Constitution and of the key Supreme Court cases that interpret it. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Our role is very clear: We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– UAE, Nigeria, Ghana, Gambia and Tunisia draft resolution on counterfeiting: (KEI), Users raise Madrid System questions: (Managing Intellectual Property), How to build brands globally: (Managing Intellectual Property), Profile: Rhonda Steele, INTA President: (Managing Intellectual Property), Securitisation and coexistence agreements: (IP finance), Get your money’s worth in trade mark damages: (Managing Intellectual Property), Brand valuation: art or science? [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am by Jeff Gamso
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]