Search for: "Wells v. Unknown" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2006, 9:49 am
There is a well-established constitutional right to speak anonymously. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by INFORRM
Second, there is  the suggestion – largely based on one judgment (Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) – that Mr Justice Tugendhat is going to be more “media friendly” as the judge in charge of the jury list. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
(Of course, Justice Alito's vote might correspond to Justice O'Connor's in some unknown percentage of these cases.) [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:42 pm by Erin E. Dardis
Because indemnification agreements allocate the risk of liability for injuries to an unknown third party, specificity is required so that the indemnitor is well aware that it is accepting liability for both its negligence and the negligence of the indemnitee. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
This follows Hacked Off’s criticism of the Bill’s media exemption, which was to protect publishers of hostile foreign state disinformation like Russia Today, as well as racist, misogynistic and other abusive publishers from regulation. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:20 am by Giles Peaker
Radcliffe Investment Properties Ltd v Meeson & Ors (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2023) UKUT 209 (LC) This is a very interesting appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the issue of a freeholder recovering waking watch costs through the leaseholder’s service charge. [read post]