Search for: "Alexander v. United States" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:06 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:29 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Eight states (Belgium, Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Malta, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) provide for a one-tier structure. 14 EU countries offer a choice of structure. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
In a press release, Panasonic stated it expects ‘relevant actions will develop and proceed in parallel in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), the newly established European Unified Patent Court (UPC) and China’. [read post]