Search for: "Davis v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2011, 5:13 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:17 pm
His lawyers filed a request to stay the execution today with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
United States, No. 18 C 2230 (In the Northern District of Illinois). [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:25 am
Court of Federal Claims in Davis Boat Works, Inc., v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen previews Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:14 pm
The rule of State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
United States, the Court strengthened the defendant’s right to accurate legal advice in relation to plea bargaining. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
United States, the Court strengthened the defendant’s right to accurate legal advice in relation to plea bargaining. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
United States, the Court strengthened the defendant’s right to accurate legal advice in relation to plea bargaining. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
The Republican president of the state Senate spoke at a rally last week in support of Davis. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
FEC Overbreadth Doctrine: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
The Court has also said, in Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
Armadale Publishers Ltd., [1979] 1 S.C.R. 1067, at p. 1090; Davies & Davies Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 6:27 am
Davies, 917 F.2d 336 (7th Cir.1990), which had been decided before the Supreme Court, in Leatherman v. [read post]