Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Bailey and Vaidik. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
  B&C has not been published or formally accepted by the EPA, but it does perform a valuable study of the field. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Additional commentary comes from Ashley Baker at the Committee for Justice blog. [read post]