Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Ackerman is a 1972 graduate of the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm
In short, the Charter protects the freedom to worship, but does not protect the spiritual focal point of worship. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
” Finally, in this week’s Foreign Policy Essay, “The Islamic State’s War Machine,” Austin Long, an assistant professor at Columbia University, examined how ISIS has institutionalized itself and why that makes it less susceptible to leadership targeting. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:25 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Pennington v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:32 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010); District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia, Thapar moved back to Ohio in 2001. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
Although travellers may enter British Columbia, for example, they must provide a self-isolation plan that will be reviewed at specified entry points, unless exempted (also see the requirement for travellers returning to Alberta from outside Alberta by air). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Ryerson University in Toronto, and the University of Ottawa-Civil Law Section, can be that civil service. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Internationally, freedom of religion or belief is a universal human right that is enshrined in both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, among other key human rights documents. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Why does that matter? [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Because this is an arms ban case, the court should have applied the common-use test required by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
However, the Van Breda test does not fit well with internet-based libel actions. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Played that role even before Folsom v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat), (IPKat)… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
In support of the proposition that the inflexible rule applies where the Appointments Clause problem does not hinge upon tenure protections, the Collins v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:28 am
Supreme Court cases like District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:35 am
Holding a masters in classical studies from Columbia University and serving as the Marine Corps colonel who investigated the looting of the Iraq National Museum in Baghdad, Bogdanos is a person familiar with cultural heritage matters. [read post]
