Search for: "Foote v. United States" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The microcells are two-foot by one-foot antennas mounted on an extender pole and attached to a utility pole. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Justin Bagdady
•    Kara Brockmeyer, head of the FCPA Unit in the Division of Enforcement, stated that the unit is off to a fast start in 2014. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
(see Horsepower) Bridge Formula A bridge protection formula used by federal and state governments to regulate the amount of weight that can be put on each of a vehicle's axles, and how far apart the axles (or groups of axles) must be to legally carry a given weight [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
United Steel Union, 25 No. 19 Westlaw Journal Employment 4, Westlaw Journal Employment April 19, 2011The 3rd U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US General The USTR Special 301 Report released: some initial reactions (TechnoLlama) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Docs) Protective orders put at risk by new bill – Sunshine in Litigation Act (Patent Docs) US Patents Making the patenting process faster (Patenthink) USPTO official ‘optimistic’ that Green Patent Fast Track will be extended again (Green Patent Blog) US Patents… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:43 am by Florian Mueller
Apple is fighting a strategic battle at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
  The sordid affair is described in detail in a published decision of the United States Court of Appeals, In re School Asbestos Litigation, 977 F.2d 764 (3d Cir. 1992). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument  in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Leval of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Manhattan, said in a lecture at New York University in 2005 that the Saucier decision was "a puzzling misadventure," imposing on judges "a new and mischievous rule. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In Condominium Corporation No. 0321365 v MCAP Financial Corporation, the Alberta Court of Appeal recently answered Yes to the first question, but Maybe to the second question. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]