Search for: "Michael Dorf"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2024, 6:15 am
Dorf, Robert S. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
See, for example, Michael Dorf.) [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
Colb, John Dean, Michael C. [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:49 pm
Dorf ed., 2d ed., Foundation Press 2009) [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
Balkin, Yale Law School Panelists: Michael C. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
Said Columbia Law professor Michael Dorf: “The claim by judges that they have no use for law review articles seems to me an anti-intellectual know-nothingism that is understandable but regrettable.” [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 6:41 pm
The Article also seeks to show that pragmatism's ostensible triumph is best understood as a contest of three distinctly legal pragmatisms: "eclectic pragmatism," as evidenced in the work of Thomas Grey and Daniel Farber, "economic pragmatism," as espoused by Richard Posner, and "experimental pragmatism," represented in the work of Charles Sabel, William Simon, and Michael Dorf. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:48 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts’ year-end report on the federal judiciary shows that Roberts “may be a closeted never-Trumper. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:20 pm
Times editorial flays Stand Your Ground, but dodges its (non)-application to Martin/Zimmerman case; Washington Post blasts same law, doesn’t seem to realize Florida homicide rate has gone down not up; chronology as of Sunday’s evidence [Frances Robles, Miami Herald] On the disputed facts of the case, it would be nice if NYT corrected its misreporting [Tom Maguire, more, yet more] Lawprof Michael Dorf vs. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:51 pm
Michael Dorf has these thoughts on D.C.'s petition. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf argues that the status of disparate impact claims under Title VII is “an ambiguity in anti-discrimination law” at the heart of the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr regards the award of so much oral argument time as “a hopeful sign for the challengers,” while Michael Dorf, writing at Dorf on Law, “offers his own possibly polyannish view . . . that the effect of 5.5 hours of combined oral argument will be to make it more likely that the Court upholds the Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf wonders why the dissenters to the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Michael Dorf outlines the issues raised by Schuette v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf discusses an amicus brief that he helped to write on behalf of the Association of American Law Schools in support of the respondents. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:06 am
Writing for Slate, Eric Posner praises the decision for “[getting] rid of a popular but unworkable idea that U.S. courts can be used to police behavior around the world,” while Michael Dorf argues in his Verdict column for Justia that “despite condemnation of the Kiobel decision from those who are sympathetic to human rights lawsuits . . . the ruling appears to leave open at least three potential avenues for ATS litigation. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
Michael Dorf weighs in on federalism-related arguments in a column for Verdict and a post at Dorf on Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
At ACSblog, Omar Jadwat lists “three things you should know” about the oral argument; Andrew Cohen ups the ante by offering “five takeaways” in The Atlantic; Michael Dorf of Dorf on Law takes the road less traveled and provides “a few offbeat observations” (three of them, since we’re counting). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:08 pm
" Michael Dorf has a good discussion of the politics of the case. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf analyzes last week’s unanimous opinion in FCC v. [read post]
