Search for: "POWELL v. STATE"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am
Powell, a Miranda case that presented no juvenile-specific issues. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
In the 1983 case of Karcher v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:38 pm
Sandford and Plessy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:01 pm
Powell. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
This second appeal–United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
Justice Lewis Powell wrote for a 5-4 majority in McCleskey v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
In the final version of the article, which appears in the Election Law Journal, I note how Justice Powell in his notes from the post-argument Buckley conference stated that Brennan stated that “selfgov[ernmen]t is arguably furthered” by the limits. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm
In Breslin v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:16 am
" (Doyle v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
On renewed permission to appeal, Arden LJ accepted that arguably this should be treated as a first appeal, the DJ having reached a decision before the relevant judgments in Pinnock and Powell, so that the CJ’s decision was the first on proportionality.Mr H submitted that this case was analogous to that of Powell in Powell v Hounslow. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
On renewed permission to appeal, Arden LJ accepted that arguably this should be treated as a first appeal, the DJ having reached a decision before the relevant judgments in Pinnock and Powell, so that the CJ’s decision was the first on proportionality.Mr H submitted that this case was analogous to that of Powell in Powell v Hounslow. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
Smith and State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm
In Furman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
Mackay J went on: “It is easy to state the law in this area, but less easy to apply it, particularly in a case with such a tragic outcome as this. [read post]
