Search for: "People v. Case" Results 1041 - 1060 of 52,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
And hence, in this case, the defendant's conviction gets reversed. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
Here's a death penalty case in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm by Steve Hall
” In a brisk four-page opinion in the case, Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm by JT
People v Grennon (Scott), 2011 NY Slip Op 21265 (App. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 9:54 am by Alicia Maule
The post Christina Swarns Exposes Risk of A Right to Fair Trial in New York Times on SCOTUS Case Shinn v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Hall
The Washington Post has an interview with Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, who argued the juvenile cases decided in Miller v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
There are four lessons one can glean from this case:(1)  Good police work is awesome to see. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  The dangers (and potential) of driving while stoned are the same in both cases. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Discrimination The principle in Thlimennos v Greece requires unlike cases to be treated differently [40]. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:13 pm
People resent how little the most important case in their lives matters to the people who make decisions about them. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry… [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
The OCC’s submission was that the duty to trace “is still a component of the search for a durable solution, that is, one which will last beyond their 18th birthday” [67] (v). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:43 am
We have learned that the "status conference" which the RIAA requested in the default judgment case, Atlantic v. [read post]