Search for: "State v. Clayton"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
Frequent meetings with the Title V/CSHCN program, the state ICC, the Academy of Pediatrics' Medical Home project, as well as CHIP, and insurance employee benefits managers ensure strong, respectful partnerships. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:56 pm
Clayton County, Ga. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
But because he agreed with the government that the merger was likely to harm competition “in at least some relevant markets”–that is, on some of the specific city-to-city routes among the hundreds identified in the government’s complaint–he ruled it a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:06 pm
But we decline his invitation to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm
FTC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No Clayton Act violation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
By Mark S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
Such a position would entail a facts and circumstances determination, and taking such a position is likely a risky strategy based on recent comments from SEC Chairman Clayton. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
In the context of merger analysis, a noted authority on antitrust law, sums up stating that: “[f]or antitrust purposes,…. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Stated in the form of 13 individual guidelines for assessing M&A activity, the draft document reads like an outline of every way the FTC and DOJ might challenge a deal as meeting the Clayton Act’s prohibition: a transaction where the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:31 am
Zarda, and Bostock v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Clayton County (11th Circuit) and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
