Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Showell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
” In another, Tennessee v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
For the most part, the Chapter 11 process has been able to harmonize the objectives of all financial stakeholders, and achieve equitable, pro-economic results. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am
Proponents for the amendments point to the SEC’s commitment to work with the DOL to harmonize the Fiduciary Rule with SEC regulations, and that the delay will give the agencies time to develop clear regulations together. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
Stanway v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
It is harmonized with European private international law. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent example is the case of Marchand v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am
Its stated purpose is to benefit all persons, especially persons with disabilities, with a “Canada without barriers” in specified areas, including employment and the built environment. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
