Search for: "State v. Young"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 8,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Mozes v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 5:53 am
DeStefano case decided earlier this year by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm
Young, 613 F.3d 735, 742 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
Regardless of whether the Supreme Court decides to hear Young v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:27 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
In the case, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification was advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:14 am
If you recall, the Supreme Court granted review of Young’s Market and tied it to the fate of Property Reserve stating that “Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Property Reserve v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:34 pm
State juries must have at least six jurors, and five of six jurors voting to convict is not enough to satisfy the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Love v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Other commentary focuses on last week’s decision in Young v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
However, in Reynolds v. [read post]
