Search for: "Farmer v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
Department of Education (USDA) to consider issuing (i) new rules under the Packers and Stockyards Act making it easier for farmers to bring and win claims, stopping chicken processors from exploiting and underpaying chicken farmers, and adopting anti-retaliation protections for farmers who speak out about bad practices; (ii) new rules defining when meat can bear “Product of USA” labels, so that consumers have accurate, transparent labels that enable them to… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:22 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Most insurance carriers such as State Farm, Allstate, Farmers, Geico, Progressive, and many others provide this coverage. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
So why is the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  The settlements were announced at a hearing alongside claims by actors Roxanne Pallett, Antony Cotton, Mark and Samantha Womack, Caroline Quentin and her husband Sam Farmer. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am by Katharine Trendacosta
The second panel featured four law professors talking about the current state of the law. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm by Aparajita Lath
This view was seconded to some extent by 1977 IPRS v/s EIMPAA SC judgment. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Malice for the purpose of showing an abuse of the qualified privilege only requires showing of a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will evidencing a willingness “to vex, harass, annoy or injure. [read post]