Search for: "Foote v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am by Alasdair Henderson
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am by Sam Hasler
Nov. 21, 2008), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered Mark Papermaster, a former IBM senior executive, to immediately cease working as Apple's Senior Vice President, Devices Hardware Engineering, in the iPod/iPhone Division. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
 Even before bin Laden’s death, its decimated leadership was barely able to communicate with its few remaining foot soldiers, let alone conceive and execute significant attacks against the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
United States, the Supreme Court Justices agreed that the government could not halt the publication of the Pentagon Papers. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:27 pm by Jeffrey Lichtman
 And now we come to the case of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman: extradited to the United States from Mexico in January of 2017, Guzman was provided federal public defenders at his first court appearance in the Eastern District of New York – despite the prosecutors claiming that his purported massive wealth did not entitle him to taxpayer-funded counsel. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:20 am by jefferyscholar
 And now we come to the case of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman: extradited to the United States from Mexico in January of 2017, Guzman was provided federal public defenders at his first court appearance in the Eastern District of New York – despite the prosecutors claiming that his purported massive wealth did not entitle him to taxpayer-funded counsel. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm by admin
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]