Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1061 - 1080
of 13,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 7:20 am
See, e.g., In re Brown, 459 F.2d 531, 535 (CCPA 1972) (“when the prior art discloses a product which reasonably appears to be either identical with or only slightly different than a product claimed in a product-by-process claim, a rejection based alternatively on either section 102 or section 103 of the statute is eminently fair and acceptable. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 2:07 pm
With the resulting disqualification motions for anyone who understands the strategic value of such motions and is armed with today's opinion.Plus, to be clear, this isn't a case involving a particular res (e.g., a $2 million insurance policy). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:02 am
Judges and lawyers have sporadic, desultory contact at e.g., Inns of Court and bench-bar conferences, and there's little communication between law schools and practitioners. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:00 am
* * * If you're on LinkedIn, consider joining the discussion of news, trends and insights in employment law, HR, and the workplace, by becoming a member of The Employer Handbook LinkedIn Group. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:27 pm
Penney and a couple of other stores (Kohl's, Macy's and Sears) for asserting alleged "sale" prices that we're accurate -- or at least didn't comply with the California Business & Professions Code. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 8:14 pm
The younger and more dynamic parts of the parties (e.g. techno-libertarians and Internet/social media liberal-progressives) will find themselves fighting the party elders on this issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 5:01 am
See, e.g., News Like This, Gtubo. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:36 am
In Re: R.M., L.M. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:20 am
The Board reversed the Examiner’s § 102(b) rejection in Ex parte TANIGUCHISchreiber is cited:Although it is well established that claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function, see, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
(RE)STARTING? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:37 am
"I wonder if they're considering adding the subtitles now. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:19 am
Sci-fi fans will be familiar with the interactive ads featured in the world of the film Minority Report, starring Tom Cruise, where upon entering a shopping mall, shoppers’ eyes were scanned to allow the shops to specifically target ads based on a particular shopper’s previous habits, e.g. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:06 am
Dan Burk's work should already be familiar to those who follow patentable subject matter debates (see, e.g., here, here, and here). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
In re Google Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:08 am
And if you're wearing a nametag with a clip, clip it up as high as you can (e.g., on the lapel rather than on the jacket pocket), so people can see it easily with a minimum of looking down. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 2:44 am
In re Houston Bites, LLC, Serial No. 87170141 (June 4, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).Examining Attorney Douglas M. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
Can an officer, as an "expert", testify on "expert" things that a jury wouldn't (allegedly) know; e.g., the nature of a gang? [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:07 am
In re Waste-Away Group, Ltd., Serial No. 77887354 (February 5, 2013) [non precedential].Examining Attorney Benji Paradewelai relied on dictionary definitions and on third-party websites in contending that the term "mechanic" identifies a type of repair and maintenance services. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:52 pm
See, e.g., Nystrom v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
(I know; you’re tearing up along with me.) [read post]
