Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1061 - 1080
of 14,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 5:55 pm
Governments operate from the flawed premise that “you can’t handle the truth. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:04 am
Simmons, Mark J. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:30 am
This recent release from the Northern Illinois University Press is not legal history, but its basic premise -- that authorship matters -- seems relevant to the field: Who Wrote That? [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
”On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:18 pm
Contributors will be encouraged to edit their contributions in light of comments received from blog readers and other discussants on social media ― so don’t be shy! [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 7:30 am
While the appellate court affirmed the district court’s denial as a matter of law to the defendants’ as to Sturgis’ claims of deceptive trade practices, false advertising and trademark infringement claims, the Eighth Circuit reversed the lower court’s findings that various marks asserted by Sturgis were valid because it found that Sturgis didn’t provide the jury with sufficient proof regarding validity. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:54 am
[Law.com] * Chief Judge William Pryor launched the Federalist Society's annual convention with a bunch of sneering jabs at Mark Joseph Stern (and Above the Law for that matter), so Stern called him up for an interview. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:16 pm
Mark Tushnet emphasizes that norms change. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
Sexual Assault Claims ReopenedNovember 24 marked the beginning of the newly enacted New York Adult Survivors Act, which allows survivors of sexual abuse (over the age of 18) to file a civil claim against the perpetrator, and any enablers of the alleged abuse, no matter how long ago the incident may have occurred. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:58 am
Rosen, with the title—I can’t make it up—”Brad Johnson: Rome, Satellites, Servers: an Update - YouTube. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:35 am
And to quote Mark again “no matter how clever you think you are being, consumers really don’t care and won’t work to get the meaning. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
Except, of course, that it isn't. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 12:55 pm
A matter of national pride, I suppose. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Such a law, the Court concluded, was unconstitutionally viewpoint-based; and even though the law didn't ban use of such marks, but only denied certain important federal trademark law benefits to such marks, the government couldn't discriminate based on viewpoint in allotting such broadly available benefits. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
Don’t delete any text messages or emails from your accuser. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
It is true that Mark could have quit if he didn’t like the Citadel’s initial decision to bury information it had developed about ReVille. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:58 am
As one U.S. court reasoned, a "bit" of likelihood of confusion is tolerated for instance when the parties had no "intent" to deceive the public and that as a matter of public policy private contracts should be enforced (T&T Mfg. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
v=UdwaqB-s4n8 People who want Becker locked up no matter his level of sanity will say he did get a fair trial and perhaps to the uneducated he did; but that doesn’t make the jury’s decision any less irrational and ultimately wrong. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:06 am
Meade J approached the matter differently. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
Its a matter of explaining yourself and focusing public attention--in short, a matter of leadership. [read post]
