Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Because of these problems of scale and diversity, Mr. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:48 am
by Megan Spencer On November 10, 2010, EPA released guidance for states and permitting authorities to begin including greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions in PSD and Title V permitting processes entitled PSD and Title V Permitting Guidance For Greenhouse Gases. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:11 pm
(United Pacific Capital v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
United States on materiality of misrepresentations made while buying a gun, particularly being a "straw purchaser. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Rev. 591 (2011) “Morrison v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd., 1997 CanLII 332, the Court stated that one additional factor is whether the dismissed employee had been induced to leave previous secure employment. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
United States, the Supreme Court said, in effect, that automobiles are, themselves, exigencies. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
I thought it useful to cover these issues in a short but distinct section after house searches, with United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Heller) and 23 June 2022 (New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
There is extensive documentation on the stance of the European Patent Office (EPO) and comparisons between the EPO and its Japanese and United States equivalents. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
