Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 9:34 am
The clearest way to explain is from a recent hearing in Orange County, Florida in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:26 am
`Standing to challenge a search requires that the individual challenging the search have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property searched. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
If the agency establishes an amount it believes is compensation for the item of property or damage, the agency shall submit a good-faith written offer for the item of property or damage. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
If the object of the warrant is to seize specific items of property, those items must be described in detail. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The reference to the agent’s assuming the phone was a “container” indicates he thought it was an item he could search without obtaining a search warrant under the search incident exception to the 4th Amendment’s default requirement that officers have a warrant to search someone’s property. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
In Holden v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:11 am
According to a Manhattan Criminal Court Judge in People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
State v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm
The sale terminates all patent rights to that item. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:43 pm
Hinton and State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 12:51 pm
Foreo Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
A United States, 5th Circuit case styled, Griggs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
A United States, 5th Circuit case styled, Griggs v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
The title -- "IP in 2015 - Where we are v Where I thought we'd be" -- is broad enough to suit all tastes and a multiplicity of interpretations. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
See Knitwaves Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
He also noted that, adecade before Riley, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Government's historical right to search without a warrant people and property crossing the border into the United States. [read post]
