Search for: "State v. Lowe" Results 1061 - 1080 of 9,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
April 11, 2019) (purported collective and class action alleging Lowe’s violated FLSA and state wage and hour laws by failing to pay hourly managers for all hours worked) Medina v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:21 am
Wallace concurred, stating though that a modified categorical approach should be used.US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Secondly, the Court clarifies that a low intensity of review is generally appropriate, other things being equal, in cases concerned with judgments of social and economic policy in the field of welfare benefits and pensions. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Derek Black
  In several states, courts either explicitly acknowledge a mandate of efficiency or the state constitution itself includes it. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
City of Maplewood] “Does the Excessive Fines Clause Apply to the States? [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last month about my certiorari petition in Herrera v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:17 pm by Cannabis Law Group
(Some CBD products do produce a mild high, but only because they have low-concentration THC.) [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
It confirms that in principle a design court in a EU Member State has jurisdiction to consider remedies, including damages, also in relation to infringing activities occurred outside the territory where the court seised has its seat. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm by Brian Crossman
" The appellate court had found that the local requirement to reserve a specified percentage of the rental units as low income units, conflicted with the state provision. [read post]