Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 1061 - 1080 of 11,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm by Ilya Somin
" Nonetheless, Mendez ruled against California on AB 450 because he concluded it violates the doctrine of "intergovernmental immunity," which bars state laws that "regulate the United States directly or discriminate against the Federal Government or those with whom it deals. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance California: “Californians Appointed to State Posts Could Soon Be Barred from Writing Checks to Lawmakers Who Vote on Their Nomination” by Patrick McGreevy for Los Angeles Times Nevada: “Lack of Transparency Questioned in Campaign Theft by DA’s Aide” by Jeff German and David Ferrara for Las Vegas Review-Journal Ohio: “Ohio’s Campaign-Finance Laws for Judges Debated at Sixth Circuit” by Kevin Koeninger for… [read post]
Angelo argues that the California Attorney General should try to persuade the Federal Court to lift the injunction against these IWPA provisions. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 8:26 am by Nassiri Law
According to a recent news article form the National Law Review, the California state legislature has just passed Assembly Bill 465 (AB 465), which prohibits the use of mandatory employment agreements by employers in the state. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:31 am by NBlack
The first to do so was the State Bar of California’s Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, which handed down a thorough roadmap for ethical generative AI adoption in law firms in November 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
Even so, today’s California Supreme Court decision denying him admission to the California bar is misguided and cruel, a verdict that embodies what is wrong with American law. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:16 pm
======================Speaking of Bar dues, see Annual bar fee statements available soon, which notes:The court authorized a fee of $412 for active attorneys, which includes a base assessment of $297, which is 5.7 percent less than the amount approved by the Legislature in 2016. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:56 am by Michael Erdman
The Court summarily disposed of her emotional distress claim stating that it was barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm by dbmadmin
The Cartwright Act is California’s state antitrust law. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:25 pm
The Supreme Court will also be looking at a California ballot measure which outlawed same-sex nuptials back in 2008 after they were briefly approved by the state. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:49 pm
Eligibility Any dues-paid member of the California Lawyers Association may nominate a member of the State Bar of California (either currently active or, if retired, previously active). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Spring 2010 issue of Competition, the journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, is now out. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
In recent years, Justice Scalia visited Pepperdine Law School, USC, USD, and appeared in California Lawyer (video) and at the State Bar's Annual Meeting in San Diego in 2014. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Jay Eng
In the decision, the court found that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:22 am
The State Bar of California's Committee on Federal Courts submitted this public comment opposing the word limit reduction proposal. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by ernesto
California has the California Email Communications Privacy Act (Cal ECPA), the Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA), and California’s state constitution provides an affirmative right to privacy that has resulted in Comcast paying fines when it unlawfully disclosed customers’ personal information. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The high court held that claims that Martin raised too late in state court, and were therefore barred there, cannot be considered in federal court. [read post]