Search for: "U. S. v. Little"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Even more seriously, there is a positive expense involved in incarcerating an individual, who will generate little if any revenue in prison but could continue to contribute to social wealth by paying a high fine and continuing to be employed. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
A little history will help set the stage for the Supreme Court’s opinion: Back in 1985, the Fourth Circuit issued a seminal decision on the effect of rejection, Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In Kilbourn v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Gross & Barbara O'Brien, Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, and New Data on Capital Cases, U. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
And if that dream is still just a little modest for you, how about if the government disavows the position it took below? [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
The issues now dominating the nation’s attention have moved the Court into uncharted territory, where pet conservative – and for that matter, pet liberal -- jurisprudential axioms offer little or no guidance. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Randolph, 547 U. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 8:09 am
Carolyn Catchot v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
U. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Here's the transcript of argument in Nos. 17-1618 and 17-1623, Bostock v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Radoslaw Mickiewicz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
Michael Fiorito v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:55 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
The INA's express provisions for deferred action are reserved for small groups such as applicants for U and T visas, granted to victims of crime and trafficking, respectively, who cooperate with law enforcement. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
