Search for: "Young v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2007, 10:35 pm
In Elian's case, he arrived in the United States after most of the occupants of the boat, including his mother, died at sea. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:20 pm
Take for example the case of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:20 pm
Take for example the case of U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm
” Peter Strzok’s message cannot possibly be construed as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In Marzari v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
The vote was 185 to 1 in favor of abolition, and the United States was the lone dissenter. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
United States, 197 U.S. 207; Bailey v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS The United States sued the state of California and California officials over California’s immigration enforcement policies. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
In all, 2,570 juveniles are serving life-without-parole sentences in the United States, the vast majority for crimes that resulted in someone’s death. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Because states have sovereign immunity only with respect to private lawsuits, not in response to lawsuits by the federal government, the United States does not need to rely on the Young fiction that a suit for an injunction against a state officer is not a suit against the state.Nonetheless, Young’s broader reasoning is highly relevant and undercuts Texas’s position. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Because states have sovereign immunity only with respect to private lawsuits, not in response to lawsuits by the federal government, the United States does not need to rely on the Young fiction that a suit for an injunction against a state officer is not a suit against the state.Nonetheless, Young’s broader reasoning is highly relevant and undercuts Texas’s position. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 6:19 am
United States also recommended changes to domestic violence law and policy. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:38 am
United States, issued on December 28. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 10:00 pm
M.P. v. [read post]
