Search for: "Doe v. Gray"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Inevitably, however, this created a difficult gray area.As it happens, my career prior to law school was as an economics professor, focusing in large part on monetary economics. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Gray v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
” Gray v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Dunson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:19 pm
And in NAACP v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 9:39 am
Cunniffe and Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 2:55 pm
” DeLisio v. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
This is a gray area that may be answered by one or more provisions in the terms of service. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
This proposal echoes the recent suggestion of Sir Charles Gray and Alastair Brett that a voluntary scheme could be established to determine preliminary issues in disputes involving the media. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]