Search for: "Good v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 45,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2009, 2:16 am
10thCir_Ctroom3.jpg In obstruction of justice trial of a police officer, in which the defendant’s mens rea was highly contested, the trial court improperly excluded the defendant’s proffer of good character evidence as a “law-abiding, trusted police officer” requiring reversal of the jury conviction, in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am by sally
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit… [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
>> Concept of State resources The Court subsequently reiterated that under Art. 87(1) EC (now Article 107(1) TFEU), any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, in so far as it affected trade between Member States, was incompatible with the common market. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Indeed, especially because of partisan gerrymandering, it was possible for Republicans in the state to garner more than half the state’s electors (if they won enough congressional districts) even if the Democratic candidate got more votes (that were packed into a smaller number of congressional districts) statewide.Whatever one thinks of the virtues of winner-take-all vs. district-by-district as a general matter, it would be good if states decided on their… [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The amended complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice and the documents submitted do not utterly refute the factual allegations underlying that cause of action (see generally Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Other states, however, have answered the question in the affirmative. [read post]