Search for: "Keene v. Keene" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Of course, frequent testifying can be undertaken for venal or political purposes, and the reputation makers behind Selikoff have been keen to protect him from charges of being a “frequent testifier. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 3:52 am
The inconsistencies in the statements of the different respondents established that they were keen on hiding material information. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
Hot(ish) off the press, the IPKat brings you news of the Court of Appeal’s (Jacob and Etherton LJJ and Sir David Keene on the Bench) judgment in Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Derek Scott (trading as Scotts Potato Machinery) [2010] EWCA Civ 1110, handed down on Friday by Lord Justice Jacob. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:09 am by Rich
Where these three areas (political v cultural v commercial) often overlap is when doing business away from the big Tier One cities. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Moria Miller
I have keen interest in developing ideas about the Supreme Court for the next generation of lawyers. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
The E. coli O157:H7 Bacteria E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]