Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1081 - 1100
of 16,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Also worth a read is Written Description's own Lisa Larrimore Ouellette's response, called Does Running Out of (Some) Trademarks Matter? [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm
The founders Stephen and Juliette Wall later explained on Twitter: “We made the decision six years ago to trade mark Pho, when Vietnamese food wasn’t as common on the high street and we only had one restaurant, to protect what we hoped would eventually become a successful restaurant business.The trade mark we own simply means only we can operate a restaurant under the name Pho (in the UK) as our restaurant brand name, but of course the word can be used in many… [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:15 am
Nevertheless, the matter still seems to be evaluated on a case-by-case approach. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
If that were all, it would have been an end to the matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
But that didn’t matter if there was non-trademark use. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:46 am
" via www.cnbc.com It doesn't matter how rich you are if your prostate goes hinky. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
I'd also be curious about the timing of counsel's departure in this matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 3:17 am
Mark Vincent Kaplan: Lawyer to Layabout Lovers [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the established case law (see T 381/02 [2.3.7] and T 1855/07 [2.2-4]), such a combination cannot be considered to be a substantive amendment (sachliche Änderung) that would allow for an objection of lack of clarity pursuant to A 84 EPC 1973 for combinations of granted claims. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
(Ugh, why not just do fair use as a matter of law?) [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
Thuan Phong also sought judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
27 May 2021, 11:08 am
Again, a repeat filing without the use of the earlier mark doesn't automatically render the repeat filing in bad faith. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
QUINN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.ROBERT T. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
QUINN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.ROBERT T. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:00 am
"McKeever submitted 37 third-party registrations on the Principal Register for marks that include the term MY with disclaimed matter [e.g., MY WEB, MY ARABIC TEACHER]. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:52 am
Sometimes, I miss the mark. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
First, the their evidence did not establish that JURA had been a well-known mark for Scotch whisky at the relevant date, but only that there had been use on a "reasonably substantial" scale [this Kat isn't sure precisely what those words mean, though he is confident that "substantial" does not mean here what it means in copyright law, where it really just means "having some substance, even if's just a little". [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 8:36 am
A challenging question, isn’t it? [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:43 am
Goods aren’t genuine “if they do not conform to the trademark holder’s quality control standards, even if they were manufactured by the mark holder. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
The arrival of spring 2022 marks a good time to revisit the manuals with counsel and update your policies and practices. [read post]
