Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2023, 6:23 am
The parent loses, but the student may proceed with the claim.The case is Rynasko v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 1:51 am
As the folks at Recording Industry v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Canada On 9 May 2023, the plaintiff’s motion for a Norwich order was dismissed by Morgan J in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
Sure, Troy may well be convicted again at a trial in which the facts are accurately explained. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Even if people who were merely arrested for minor offenses -- and may not even be guilty of anything -- were forced to undergo invasive and humiliating strip searches for no real benefit. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:44 pm
A recent New Jersey Supreme Court Case, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
, People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:43 am
In addition, Fenderson‘s account records showed the following transactions: withdrawals of $8,341.58 for April 2006; deposits of $883.51 and withdrawals of $20,370.61 for May 2006; deposits of $824.43 and withdrawals of $8,143.91 for June 2006; deposits of $1,048.92 and withdrawals of $14,050.87 for July 2006; deposits of $418.34 and withdrawals of $9,659.24 for August 2006; deposits of $397.91 and withdrawals of $15,948.97 for September 2006; deposits of $446.15 and withdrawals of… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:40 pm
Which may explain why Ms. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:55 am
There may have been better ways of doing what went down here; in particular, the judge should have made sure to invite back the people waiting out in the hall as seats became available.But that doesn't mean that defendant gets a retrial. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
Assigned appellate counsel, who upon a review of the record conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues, may move to be relieved of the assignment (People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 11:52 am
However, as Barenborg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
(See, People v Ammons (41 AD3d 1325)). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 6:07 am
In Arista v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
” Thus, an officer may conduct unrelated checks during a lawful stop, but he may not do so in ways that prolong the stop, absent reasonable suspicion. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
As mentioned above, on 2 May 2024, there was a statement in open court in Percival v Belfield QB-2022-000902. [read post]
