Search for: "People v. Sell"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 5,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
” It sounds to me like the American Trucking Court had definitely concerned itself with short-selling the American people and was not worried about granting anyone too much protection. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
Futures v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 5:36 am
Studies on willingness to pay v. willingness to accept: people assign different values to their personal information depending on whether they're focusing on protecting it or revealing it. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:11 pm
Numerous people have been injured, blinded or killed after these airbags sent metal and plastic shards flying through a vehicle. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 1:22 am
It would have been a water-cooler moment, with people commenting on it. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:43 am
This principle is known as the first sale doctrine, and that's why people can sell used books, movies, and music on eBay and Amazon. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
This principle is known as the first sale doctrine, and that’s why people can sell used books, movies, and music on eBay and Amazon. [read post]
Eighth Circuit Finds That Two Nearly Simultaneous Drug Sales Are One Offense for Sentencing Purposes
10 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Examples include: Evidence in the Doe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
v=y7uZNbWrkbk Transcript: I am attorney Jeramie Fortenberry. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 5:49 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York recently held oral argument regarding the pending motions in the Lower East Side People’s Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
” At the Opinionator Blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Simmons v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Here it comes: when the Supreme Court expressly rejected the stop-selling theory, “that statement was made in the context of the Bartlett case, where the drug was safe and effective for the vast majority of the people taking it, and ceasing to act would have benefitted only ‘the very small number’ of people who suffered an adverse reaction. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Prestonettes, 264 U.S. 359 (1924) and Champion Spark Plug Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:34 am
Truitt v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
The implications of the recent debate over 23andMe is even more important after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:35 am
As we recently found out from the CA Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
