Search for: "People v. Church"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Still smarting from the fact that after Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:23 am
Instead, relying on Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
No reasonable person can doubt that LGBT people form committed relationships, raise children (quite capably), and contribute to their communities and their churches. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:13 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:44 am
I can not imagine anyone relishing a fight with anyone over rights for women that many believed settled by Griswold v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
And in Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 10:30 am
I’m not sure who counts as two-fifths of a person in Florida, but apparently the thinking there is that an average family has 3.4 people. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:23 am
[…] Chang v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
V. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
”Of course the Church is fully free to preach these views and to hold their clergy to them. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:17 am
Accordingly, those individuals or institutions within the Church of England who are responsible for the solemnisation of marriage or the burial of the dead must act in a manner which is compatible with the principle of freedom of religion or belief, and must not discriminate on the basis of their religion in people’s enjoyment of their rights…” [11]. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
People can avoid a church if they don't agree with its doctrine, but they can't so easily (in many cases not at all) avoid their state or nation. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Channel Four v IC EA/2010/0134. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
The court rules 8-0 that a pension plan maintained by a church-affiliated organization qualifies as a “church plan” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, regardless of who established it. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:13 am
Texas and WWH v. [read post]
