Search for: "Russell v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
” Justice Ginsburg argued that the Justices should have delayed hearing such cases while the state-by-state process evolved, or alternatively, should have struck down just the Texas law without declaring a right to privacy that legalized the procedure nationwide The ABA Journal’s Jill Schachner Chanen discusses the film The Loving Story, a documentary on the couple behind the Court’s landmark decision in Loving v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
Tuesday morning brought us the court’s first decision from its November argument session, in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am by Rachel Sachs
  Also for this blog, Kevin Russell reviews Wednesday’s oral argument in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by William Baude
[Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in both Walden v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
” At the National Review’s Bench Memos, Roger Clegg notes recent developments in California that, in his view, bolster the state’s case in Schuette v. [read post]