Search for: "State v. Daniels"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 5,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Biele Professor of Law and Affiliate Professor of History, Harvard UniversityPanelists:• Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Daniel P.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
By: Daniel T. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:48 am
Supreme Court, the State of Maryland avoided potential FMLA liability yesterday in Coleman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
In fact it was not until the landmark care of People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:58 am
Here are the materials in Brakebill v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Student Contributor: Danielle List [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Trevor Carter, Partner at Baker & Daniels and Practice Center Contributor, and Dorothy R. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 10:41 am
Daniel I. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:23 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Daniel Ghebrehiwet v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:28 am
Updating this entry yesterday on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Joseph Bonner et al v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy thoughtfully suggests that such an actor should not be permitted to do so as the Supreme Court's per curiam decision follows the logic of Bush v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
The following guest post is by Daniel Taskalos. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:03 pm
Gregory Scott Parks, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and Danielle C. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 4:32 am
In this case, Hasan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
Here's the abstract: On May 17, 1954, the day that the Supreme Court handed down Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:19 pm
" Here at Concurring Opinions, Daniel J. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
In the original 1964 photo, King flashed the “V for victory” sign after learning the US Senate had passed the civil rights bill. [read post]
