Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 7,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
In the first new decision, Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Even in the most important non-EU European jurisdiction, the UK, SEP holders get far greater leverage than in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
The only exception was set forth in Perlman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:38 am
City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Plata, it affirmed a decision by a three-judge district court panel ordering California officials to release state prisoners ; and in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Holder (08-495) — challenge to banishment after felony conviction Bobby v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In 2006, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Scotch Whisky Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
AG Holder: Assassination is unlawful. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
” (citing Galef v Alexander and Edgar v MITE Corp, respectively, p.15) And so, as agreed by the parties, Dutch law would apply to this action. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:10 am
Holder, 09-3472-ag U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Which brings us to Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership and Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm
NIV holders must return home when their visas expire. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm
NIV holders must return home when their visas expire. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
I.e. member states could delay the effectiveness of this provision to the year 2525 if they so desire. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
In Summerhill Village Homeowners Association v. [read post]
