Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens made clear: Our new government is founded upon . . . its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Following Advocate General Sharpston’s opinion, the Court stated that the InfoSoc Directive, which confers a more generous protection to TPMs than the Software Directive, should govern TPMs used in videogames. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:48 am
Post by Sherry Colb In my column for this week, I write about the Supreme Court's upcoming case, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by David Pocklington
In response to the assertion of both the PCC and the DAC “which appeared to suggest that the mere fact that the proposal is outside the Churchyard Regulations is a reason why a faculty should not be granted” he stated: “[16]. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
For filing requirements, please refer to the United States Bankruptcy Code (title 11, United States Code), the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Bankruptcy Rules), and the Local Rules for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:30 am
Awaiting Judge Lee's Decision in Rosetta Stone - Last week, the AmeriKat and IPKat wrote about the breaking news of Judge Lee's granting of summary judgment in favor of Google in the Adwords case brought by Rosetta Stone. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Cary Coglianese
They possess a “unique responsibility” to pursue justice, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of Young v. [read post]