Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
United States (1928). [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
Judge Elizabeth Magner, in McCain v Ocwen, ______________, stated that the evidence adduced i [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
United States; granted Feb. 20, 2007, argued Oct. 30, 2007) Shortest amount of time: 96 days (Meacham v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
United States Olympic Comm., 483 U.S. 522, 524 [9] Id at 544. [10] Olympic Committee Demands Local Gyro Stand Change Names (August 24, 2012) [11] Stop the Olympic Prison v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:12 am
In Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd continued on 30 and 31 October 2017 before Moulder J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
For example, In United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
