Search for: "Wills v. Price" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
Even absent a range of existing competitors, there are a large number of potential competitors -- lawyers and economists -- who would be willing to enter the market and provide their own copyright expressions of this issue, should they see me trying to extract a monopoly price for my writing. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:03 am by jonathanturley
So this holiday, I will be giving a special thanks to those who are willing to don the robe and seek to do simple justice. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:12 am by Peter Mahler
Emerson (pictured above) in a case called Federico v Brancato, 2014 NY Slip Op 50902(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
The former chairman of Morrison & Foerster says of these workers: "The ones who want to cut back, I don't think they really in their hearts are willing to make the real trade-off, which is being a kind of so-so lawyer. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm by Adam Levitin
Now the price of 100% resolution will be the price necessary to get 100% of tort victims to consent and the price of 95% resolution will be the price necessary to get 95% of victims to consent, etc. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am by Merpel McKitten
At 10, the authors state that third parties which are not nominal addressees of the FRAND commitment may still "benefit from the Huawei v ZTE negotiation framework". [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
At first, Ebenezer thought the vision was just the price of his ill-advised decision to add french fries to his late-night burrito. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Another Facebook Reversal The Court of Appeals of Iowa issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
[v]  The shortened timeframe for creditors to file claims increases the likelihood that the new owners will be able to acquire a clean title to the property. [read post]