Search for: "Davis v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am by Kelly Becker
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
The State presented Sergeant Steven Schafer of the IMPD Computer and Digital Forensic Unit to testify as an expert in forensic analysis of social media records and digital trails. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:17 am by Brian Evans
On May 26, the United Nations released a report by the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, which highlights, among other things, some of the major flaws in the US judicial system related to the death penalty. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 4:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brackeen, the Supreme Court returned to the foundational question of federal authority over relations between the United States and Native nations, long known as “Indian affairs. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s development and application of the doctrine of “prosecution history disclaimer” is consistent with fundamental principles of separation of powers, the Patent Act, and long-established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am by Jeff Foust
United Launch Alliance (ULA), in a statement posted on its website, backed the government’s motion to lift the injunction, while also firing a shot at SpaceX. [read post]
United States Department of Agriculture, which addressed the proper standard of review for compelled commercial speech. [read post]