Search for: "GONZALEZ v. THE STATE" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Rodriquez 125 days 6-3 2; Alito(m), Souter(d) Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
LUZELMA CAMPOS, BETTY JO GONZALEZ, AND MISTY VALERO, No. 11-0728 Per Curiam This case under the Texas Tort Claims Act involves the intersection between two quirks of the Texas statute — that that statute bars claims for intentional torts against the State and that any negligence claims for personal injury against the State generally must flow from the use of “tangible personal property. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Clearly, O'Connor believes that women offer a qualitatively different (perhaps even better) perspective than men in certain settings.Justice GinsburgIn United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Maybe Google will now strike the same kind of agreement with Match Group, though it's unclear how soon the trial in the Match Group case will take place (theoretically the court could try to rush things the way Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers did in Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am by Mike Reiner
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY Gonzalez v 3M took place in the Supreme Court of New York County, and was presided over by Judge Mendez. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am by Mike Reiner
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY Gonzalez v 3M took place in the Supreme Court of New York County, and was presided over by Judge Mendez. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am by Mike Reiner
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY Gonzalez v 3M took place in the Supreme Court of New York County, and was presided over by Judge Mendez. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court notes that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of the commission of a specific crime is sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest as also ruled in People v Lee, Kramer v City of New York and People v Gonzalez. [read post]