Search for: "Grant J. Book"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2019, 5:57 am
Exceptions apply in the case of loans granted in the context of restructuring/compositions procedures. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Evans, 536 U.S. 452, 492 (2002) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part; joined in relevant part by Kennedy, J.); DOC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
J. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Sharp J granted summary judgment, holding that the words complained of were not capable of bearing any meaning defamatory of the Claimant. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Court presumably granted review because the Fifth Circuit’s position was out of line with the rule in other circuits; when it granted review it asked for briefs also on the propriety of jurisdiction (a question not raised by the parties, but in the Court’s view the subject of a separate circuit conflict). [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
Judge Ho references Vivek Ramaswamy's book, Woke, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
Instead of providing responsible crisis leadership, President Donald J. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
J. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
Putin of Russia intervened to benefit Donald J. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
On February 18, 2010, the court granted the Monastery’s motion for partial summary judgment on its breach of contract claim and on the infringement claim regarding the St. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
These state constitutional amendments (or provisions in new state constitutions) largely date from the latter decades of the 19thcentury and bar the use of taxpayer money to fund religious entities.[13]Three-quarters of the states had—and most of these continue to have—such amendments on the books. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:05 pm
The DBA requires the payment of prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed for the construction, alteration, or repair of certain federally funded or assisted contracts, which now includes certain renewable energy projects under the IRA.[1] Legislation that authorizes federal assistance for construction—via grants, loans, loan guarantees, and insurance—and incorporate Davis-Bacon reporting requirements are known as the Davis-Bacon Related Acts (the… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Magliocca* The health care debate was the defining event of President Obama’s first year in office, and the constitutional challenge to the individual health insurance mandate enacted in 2010 will probably be the signature Supreme Court case during his Administration.[1] Some argue that the Commerce Clause does not grant Congress the power to coerce Americans to buy insurance if they do not want it.[2] Others say that the requirement that those who do not buy insurance must pay a… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:57 pm
“The father of American traction”: Frank J. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 4:07 pm
Following severe criticisms of the Chamber’s judgement and with the support of 69 media organisations, Internet companies, human rights groups and academic institutions, the Grand Chamber Panel granted Delfi’s request for a referral to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
(Case No. 10-00253), a Federal Court in Hawaii refused to grant an injunction to a Congressional candidate to prevent the airing of a televised political debate from which he was excluded. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
. * * * * *The obvious importance of the case prompted our grant of certiorari. 542 U.S. 936, 124 S.Ct. 2909, 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004). [read post]
