Search for: "In Re Marriage of Short"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2017, 7:36 pm
In short, the GRCL seem to make it impossible to argue that a contract or other civil law act is invalid because it contravenes some low-level rule unless that contravention can be called a violation of public order or fine customs. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 7:36 pm
In short, the GRCL seem to make it impossible to argue that a contract or other civil law act is invalid because it contravenes some low-level rule unless that contravention can be called a violation of public order or fine customs. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
Several each year also are part of the approximate 11,000 people will die in automobile accident related drunk-driving crashes (we’re talking about 1 every 50 minutes). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
In short, in an appropriate case, a closed procedure would be more likely than PII to achieve justice through a fair trial. b) No defence The trouble with a case like Al Rawi is that the government parties defending the action have to certify PII in respect of certain evidence, but they cannot rely on it at the trial and are therefore unable to defend the action. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
It pointed out that Domestic Relations Law 253 does not provide that a defendant in an action for divorce, where the marriage was solemnized by a member of the clergy or a minister, must provide the plaintiff with a Get. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
" (In re Marriage of Fink (1979) 25 Cal.3d 877, 887.) [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Burger Court & the Rise of the Judicial Right (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 450), by Michael J. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
To be sure, it is very easy to over-read a three-sentence opinion issued in a very short period of time on a motion for a stay. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:45 am
All legal marriages, including same-sex marriages, are recognized. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In this article, we too argue that the madwomen lawyers in Laws of Attraction, Michael Clayton, and I am Sam can be re-read as women seeking themselves. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:14 pm
At the suggestion of Ordinary Gentleman Rufus F., I undertook to read Chris Hedges’ new book The Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In short, neither the Free Exercise Clause, nor the statute designed to re-impose a “strict scrutiny” test upon government actions burdening religious exercise, offers any protection for sacred sites held by the federal government, no matter how central to a tribe’s religion. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:03 am
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room Big Thanks Re: TomFloccoSends WMR: BREAKING! [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:15 am
In particular, “That’s a nice little nothing you’re wearing, I approve! [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Our current reality is one of ever-present stress and tension, rooted in exhausting controversy across a constellation of cultural flashpoints: race, sex, gender expression, marriage, reproductive rights, religion, immigration, guns, and education. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
II. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
On a whim, some states will introduce gay marriage and others will put a prohibition against it into the state constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
Sullivan's name in Connecticut during the marriage. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His replacement might be less willing to do so. * * * * * For ninety percent of readers, everything you’re going to want to know about this post appears above. [read post]
