Search for: "People v. Green" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm by Cory Doctorow
Every day, there are new reasons that otherwise reasonable people will find to break the tech we use in increasingly vital and intimate ways—and every day, there will be new people who are awoken to the need to fight against this temptation. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
V Nonimmigrant Visas for Family Reunification The new bill allows for special provisions to keep families together via the V nonimmigrant visa type. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(Patently-O) USPTO Director talks up green patent initiatives (Green Patent Blog) Misconceptions of provisional patent applications (OC Patent Lawyer) Commerce Secretary Locke announces new members of Patent Public Advisory Committee (Patent Docs) (Patents4Life)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Firm disqualified from representing party on appeal where partner served as opponent’s expert at trial: Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=0Yi-LvnM_5M Don’t make Iowa a place for American Idiot! [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 3:51 pm
Consideration of Aboriginal Peoples - expanded and more detailed consideration of Aboriginal peoples in terms of consultation and involvement Part V - Integration - briefly mentions “green industries”, includes sentence on First Nations’ participation and using science 4. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:01 pm by Joseph Tomain
  When I teach Cyberlaw, I include Porter v. [read post]
Our TMT Group at Epstein Becker Green is well poised to assist employers in developing the necessary workplace policies and programs to serve these needs. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Hologic (Docket Report) Intematix – New Intematix LED patent has its customers covered (Green Patent Blog) Stambler- First post-bench/bar order on e-mail discovery limits: Stambler v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]