Search for: "People v. Samuels"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
Circuit, Brett Kavanaugh was an outspoken critic of the doctrine In a 2017 speech, Justice Samuel Alito said the result of Chevron deference has been “a massive shift of lawmaking from the elected representatives of the people to unelected bureaucrats. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm
" Cutter v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
With the more conservative Justice Samuel Alito replacing O’Connor, Ginsburg found herself in a role that Hirshman describes as a “great dissenter” – registering her disagreement with the majority’s decisions in the Lilly Ledbetter gender-discrimination case, in the Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Don't be one of those people. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Don't be one of those people. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Don't be one of those people. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
But Oracle v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
In dissent, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, protested that “whether petitioner is entitled to relief on this [second-step] ground has nothing to do with Foster,” since Foster addressed only Batson’s third step. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2024, 2:29 pm
The case is Wade v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
Kennedy and Samuel A. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
Unfortunately for the government and Catholic women, however, Roman Catholic Justice Samuel Alito included some Catholic moral theology in his substantial burden analysis in Burwell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm
In Cohen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
The Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
John McCain, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
A v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 11:05 am
The People of the State of California v. [read post]
