Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 5,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 9:34 am
In Barnes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:00 pm
Learn what happened after the jump.The bar is the Houlihan's in Brick, New Jersey and the case is Pauly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Snap, Lee v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
Last week, in Bowerman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
Stambovsky v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
We tell people that these words are very important, because typically they are, as confirmed by the recent unpublished decision from the North Carolina Court of Appeals Strohm v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 8:44 am
See: Martin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 2:42 pm
In the case of Bernabei v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court has just finished hearing oral argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
” Talbot v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
In Case v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
As Justice Kennedy explained: The physical presence rule has long been criticized as giving out-of-state sellers an advantage. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:06 pm
Ponsford has worked extensively with clients in troubled real estate and commercial ventures, representing both purchasers and sellers of distressed property, banks and borrowers in workout situations, and generally giving advice to distressed entities. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:06 pm
Ponsford has worked extensively with clients in troubled real estate and commercial ventures, representing both purchasers and sellers of distressed property, banks and borrowers in workout situations, and generally giving advice to distressed entities. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
The 1st DCA cited to the Florida Supreme Court’s holding in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Lenders Standing at Foreclosure Creadon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 9:37 am
In 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Read the full decision at: Lawes v. [read post]
