Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 7:54 am
In VVM Builders, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029.) [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
"This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In short, the court concluded that the FDA would never view the relevant regulations in the same way that the plaintiff in Kemp had twisted them in search of something to call a violation.By misconstruing FDA requirements, the violation claims in Kemp in reality would have imposed requirements that differed from those of the FDA. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:17 pm
Indeed, we saw in the Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Jepson held that rent repayment orders cannot be made against a superior landlord (for example in a ‘rent to rent’ situation) but this case is due to be appealed to the Supreme Court next year. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Pell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
In short this is the grisly game of asbestos litigation that occurs in the courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:53 pm
In Photocure v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:03 pm
In other words, the number has to be downright insane.Prior to the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:14 pm
The short answer is no. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am
The harmonisation of approach in this area across the Member States is, of course, the primary objective of the Rome II Regulation (see Recitals (6) and (15)) and this interpretation appears, therefore, teleologically superior, even if it leads to a short term problem (now expired) in terms of the foreseeability of court decisions (see Recital (16)). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Superior Court, 132 Cal.App.4th 826, 833-35)). [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:22 am
Already at the TRO/PI stage she expressed her discomfort with a decision in Epic v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
All of these are qualities that seem in short supply these days. [read post]
